A. Hanson (Denver, CO 2012) |
For my Gospel and Global Media Culture class we
were asked to reflect again this week on Gospel and how that interfaces with
our varying contexts, in particular, digital contexts. If anything, after
twelve weeks of discussing Gospel, I am even less clear about what this means.
Although I am not sure that is necessarily a bad thing.
If you ask most people what "Gospel"
means, if they have any answer at all, they will tell you that it is confined
to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Which is not wrong.
If you ask a Lutheran seminarian, they will
probably try and demonstrate their knowledge and show off and talk about law
and gospel in preaching and theology. Also, not wrong. But
confusing to anyone not in seminary.
You might also get some variations on “good news”
or “salvation” when asking about Gospel.
I guess after all this discussion this semester I
have settled on Gospel as promise. We call Matthew, Mark, Luke and John
“gospels” because they tell the story of the life and work and saving action of
Christ. We speak of law and Gospel throughout the Bible because the
promise of God is not confined to these four books. Gospel is the most
basic promise made by God that your sins are forgiven and you have been given
new life. Gospel happens not only in preaching, but also in the way that
we interact with one another. If we are living out of the Gospel promise
we are not going to condemn another person for their identity or actions,
because we are all redeemed in the same way under Christ. Gospel means that our
past sins do not define us and that we are a new creation.
What does this mean for digital cultures? It
means that we have an even wider, deeper, and more expansive world. It
means that our words and actions have greater reach and greater
consequences. It means that more is at stake and more is possible.
I think that is also means that we need to rethink how we look at what it means
to be and do church.
In my Holy Spirit, Church, and the Triune God (Pneumatology) class we
have been spending a lot of time talking about Church. I have
figured out that my definition of church is the place where the Gospel is heard
and where we are equipped to take that message into the world. So I guess that means a discussion of where
the church exists. I do not believe that
church should be contained within the four walls of a building. I believe it is anywhere people are
gathered. For convenience sake,
sacraments and preaching often happen in a church, but what would it look like
to take church out into the world?
My teaching congregation here in St Paul, Humble Walk Lutheran Church,
is planning on moving church to the park for worship this summer. It will probably be a little clunky and there
will be some things to work out, but it also has the potential to be really
great. Taking church out into the world
also means engaging in digital conversation.
How can we create safe digital spaces for exploring matters of faith?
How can we foster the same hospitality online as we do when we take church into
the park? I came away from this semester with far more questions than answers, but maybe that is the point.
This post and your previous one "Being Church" are getting at the same thing, at least to me. We are to be "everywhere" a child of God and proclaiming God's love through the Son, Christ Jesus. When we start with who we are and how we can express God's love through our own dispossession of power and status for the sake of the other, whatever medium we are engaged in - online or face to face - that is where we are living out the gospel. Gospel is more than descriptive of belief. Gospel is active in and through people - people forgiving, and loving each other into relationship with a God who loves us enough to seek relationship through incarnational connection to human reality.
ReplyDelete